June 30, 2019 Freedom Galatians
5: 1; 13-25
Rev. Peter Hofstra
Christ
makes us free. It says so twice in the
first verse, “for freedom, Christ has set us free”. Sounds redundant, doesn’t it? But is it?
With
July 4 approaching, “freedom” should be ringing in our ears. America is about to turn 243. Freedom was the cry of 1776 and the American
Revolution. We kicked out the Brits
because they were impinging on our freedoms.
These are ‘freedoms to’, freedoms to do things. But what is freedom as an ideal?
Freedom
is a foundational concept for our church.
What is our call? To give our
hearts to the Lord eagerly and sincerely.
That assumes we are free to do so.
How can we truly be eager or sincere about anything if we are doing it
under duress or threat?
Imagine
a philosophy class considering this question, “what is freedom?” I have to imagine because I never took a
philosophy class. It feels more like a
comedy sketch. I imagine some older
gentleman in a slightly creased suit, hand in his pocket, twirling his glasses
in the other hand, squinting out at the lecture hall and asking, “What is
freedom?” The answer might be some kind
of academic nonsensical double talk, “Freedom is a metaphysical transcultural
intersocietal neurological astrological construct….” It might be fairer to say that we know
freedom when we see it, but defining it is more challenging.
Some
would argue that freedom is a ‘state of being’.
There is truth to that. In honor
of the 4th, consider our history.
Before the Civil War, people were in two ‘states of being’ in this
country. There were slaves and there were
free. Drill down a little bit, consider
the African American community. Pardon
the old fashioned language, but there were slaves and there were “free
blacks”. To be free was to be “not a
slave”. Freedom was conditional.
From
there, I think we can understand that when Paul is telling us that Christ makes
us free, it is not because Jesus is inserting us into a philosophical,
metaphysical construct. He is freeing us
FROM something. He is freeing us from
sin. That is foundational to our
salvation through Jesus’ death and resurrection.
Using
the language of our history, the bible tells us we were slaves to sin, but now
we are free, through Christ. Freedom is
a condition of the work of Christ at Easter.
But
Paul doubles the wording: In freedom, Christ made us free Paul says. Freedom has two meanings here. First, ‘in freedom’ means that Jesus was free
from sin, ever tempted, never fell for it.
In that freedom, his sacrifice on the cross was a perfect atonement,
worthy of God for our sins and we were made free from the consequences of sin. Thus free, we can choose how we shall again
enslave ourselves again.
That
is the language that Paul gives us. We
are free to become slaves to one another, through love, to fulfill the great
commandment, thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. Or we are free to use the opportunity of
self-indulgence. We are free to gratify
the desires of the flesh. Which carry
their own consequences. But Paul does,
in fact, warn us
If,
however, you bite and devour one another, take care that you are not consumed
by one another.
Let me sidebar for
a moment. I have to say, I am not a big
fan of Paul’s language that we have to be enslaved to one another, not a big
fan of slave language at all. Slavery
has a cruel and vicious history in our experience. Yes, slavery was different in kind under the
Romans, but to make that case undercuts our own experience with slavery in our
nation’s history. Maybe more current
language is that we have a life choice to make.
We are free to choose how we shall live. More important than the language of how we
express it-our life choice or enslavement-more important are the consequences
of those choices.
On this, Paul is very
clear. If we choose the flesh, if we
choose self indulgence,
the works
of the flesh are obvious: fornication, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry,
sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, anger, quarrels, dissensions, factions,
envy, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these. I am warning you, as I
warned you before: those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of
God.
But given the preferred
choice, love of neighbor, By contrast, the
fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity,
faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. There is no law against such
things.
Freedom
is then a choice. We can choose to love
our neighbor, we can choose to be self-indulgent. Jesus chose love of neighbor, chose to love
us to the point of giving up his life for us.
There is no argument as to which choice Paul is calling upon us to make
here, for the love of neighbor.
But
while it is easy to state things as black and white, as right and wrong, to
talk about them in absolutes, life is never that cut and dried. Because sometimes the church, seeking to love
neighbor, falls down and becomes self-indulgent when they place other things as
more sacred than the love of God and neighbor.
In
college, I attended a church because of their active young adult fellowship. It was a good place for me to be at that
point in my life. And this church took
seriously the application of biblical precepts to the things of everyday life.
Which was a good thing. Until it was
not.
A
gentleman, recently divorced, joined the church and our active young adult
group. Married too young, divorced
quickly, came to the faith afterward as he was seeking to build a new
life. God bless him. Eventually began a relationship with one of
the women in the group. Good and
fine. Then his ex-wife came to the
church. Maybe not so bad unto
itself. She also expressed that she had
come to believe. Again, something to
celebrate. And she wanted to reconcile
with her ex-husband. He did not want to,
that relationship was done. She went to
the leaders of the church to back her play, and they did. They said he must reconcile with his ex, in
the name of Christ and the sanctity of marriage, thus cutting off his new relationship. My friends ended up leaving the church, there
was schism in their families, because of this, because they would not “accept”
the guidance and discipline of the church.
My
take is that church became self-indulgent in declaring that marriage was more
important than neighbor. It was a
decision made from the best of intentions.
But that church went from gentleness to strife, peace to dissension,
love to quarrels.
This
is a big and painful example of what can happen when love of neighbor is lost
in the freedom that we have in Christ.
The
fact of the matter is no one in that church leadership was out to hurt anyone
else. They felt they were doing God’s
will. They were taking it
seriously. And there was a time when
they probably could have enforced their will upon the members of their
church. But that was also a time when
“marriage” was sacred and blessed by the church, but what happened inside the
marriage-all too often abuse, even violence, that was “none of the church’s
business”.
The
law of God is very clear, love God, love neighbor, everything else derives from
that. When the church decides something
is more important than neighbor, even some as important as marriage, things can
break down. How about a lesser example,
like daring to challenge the conclusion that so many churches make, “we have
always done it this way”. The
‘tradition’ has become its own sacred cow.
As soon as a church finds itself saying something like that, there is a
danger that their freedom has shifted from love to a self-indulgent danger-even
unintentionally.
The challenge for
any church looking to be faithful to the witness of Jesus Christ is how
consciously and intentionally they can connect a statement like “we’ve always
done it this way” to the precept that we exercise our freedom to love our
neighbor. But how?
The challenge for
the church is to honestly and openly review its own behavior to see what is
happening. If the fruit of the spirit
are manifest, love, joy, peace,
patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control
then things are probably okay. And the
tradition serves the Lord’s purpose.
But if there is
dissension in the church, if factions are forming, if there is anger or
jealousy or strife, those behaviors are warning signals. They should be telling us LOUD AND CLEAR that
our freedom has moved from the love of neighbor into something else, something
sinful, something disruptive. The
tradition has become important unto itself, and the bible calls that idolatry. Because the consequences for that are very
clear. Those who do such things will NOT
inherit the kingdom of God.
It is the mature
and loving church that can look at itself with a critical eye and catch these
things when they are happening. And when
they do, the solution in clear. In
Christ, we are made free. We are free to
stop what we are doing and begin again.
We are not only free to, but blessed with the opportunity to confess to
God and to one another and receive the sweet healing of forgiveness. And in those moments of renewal and forgiveness,
the church grows spiritually-both inwardly and outwardly.
So
to understand what freedom is in Christ enhances our understanding and wisdom
of how freedom is the gift of God that can be the loving joy in which we give
our hearts eagerly and sincerely to the Lord.
Amen.